The Constitutional Declaration will not be amended to include representatives of the armed groups in the transitional government before reaching a comprehensive peace agreement, said a leading figure in the Forces for Freedom and Change (FFC) on Sunday. On 11 September 2019, a Sudanese government and the armed groups signed "The Juba Declaration of Confidence Building Measures and the Preparation for Negotiation".
[...]
Article 69 of the Constitutional Document provides that the comprehensive peace agreements signed between the Transitional Authority and the armed movements shall be included in this Constitutional Document in accordance with its provisions.

Documents (April 22, 2019) from Forces of the Declaration of Freedom and Change and the Sudanese Professionals Association, April 2019
Full text (Arabic only; 10 pages): Proposal of governance structures and the constitution of the state, for the transitional period in Sudan
TEXT: Draft of the Sudan Interim National Constitution, May 2005

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.

EIB begins metamorphosis into climate bank

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.

< reckless eyeballin' >

ensued

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.

Johnson denies lying to queen, wins Brexit court case
"Operation Yellowhammer" [pdf] + "claim and counterclaim, assertion and counter-assertion, allegation and denial, blow and counter-blow" [no pdf] + "They also passed a law that orders the government to seek a three-month delay to Brexit if no agreement has been reached by late October, and rejected Johnson's call for a snap general election." [HC 433, no pdf] + "primeministers" [!] = "six defeats in the House of Commons in as many days"

m'k. whatevs.
McCord (Raymond), JR83 and Jamie Waring's Applications v The Prime Minister and others
(Wightman  and  Others  v  Secretary  of  State  for  Exiting  the  European  Union. lanssakes. What's that doing in there? o. right. relevant case law.)

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.

... The Applicant contends that it is unlawful for the Prime Minister to ffect or attempt to effect a withdrawal from the European Union outside of the express terms, provisions and safeguards set out in theEuropean Union(Withdrawal) Act 2018 ('EUWA) ...

Only on p 5 of McCord but certain I need more beer, possibly weed to continue.

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.

[  ] criminal - evidence beyond reasonable doubt
[X] civil - preponderance of evidence

[50] Second, the Applicants bear a burden of proof.  This was highlighted recently in JG v Upper* Tribunal, Immigration  and Asylum Chamber [2019] NICA  27 at [34]: ...

... a recent pronouncement of this court, in Re Kelly's Application* [2018] NIQB 8, at [9]: "In my judgement the fundamental flaw in this challenge is that it is brought in a legal and factual vacuum. It has no legal framework since it is not concerned with an actual decision of the Secretary of State, a proposed decision of the Secretary of State, an explicit refusal by the Secretary of State to exercise any of the powers, duties, functions or discretions conferred by [the 1998 Act], a failure by the Secretary of State to do so or, finally, a failure to consider whether to do so. Consequential upon this analysis, the Applicant's challenge has no factual framework either. It is entirely devoid of context. Absent a concrete context, I consider that there nothing to which the relevant common law principles fall to be applied. These principles are entirely dormant at the moment. They have no role in the setting of the Applicant's unavoidably vague and speculative case that a factual and legal context might arise in some unspecified circumstances on some unpredicted future date.

It is an easy read, although a lengthy 67 pp of NI-Eng. A good portion of this is given to loooong passages quoted from the substantive ("legal") documentary evidence--UK statutes and negotiation agreements ("construction") between UK and EU since 2017. The affect seems to have been to torture the paranormal, or psychic, abilities of the Applicants with expressed, rational intention of the controlling parties committed to existing, ie. current, written law in force. There is no "hard border."

The recitation of EUWA2018 sect. 13 is inserted, I believe, for comic relief--the establishment of "Bureaucracy" by the impotent parliament and all that.

The court dismissed all but one of the three Applicants' ("plaintiffs") arguments for relief, injunction, etc.

The plaintiffs are granted leave to appeal only questions on EUWA2018 section 10. That is indeed fertile ground to plant, so to speak, finally and indisputably the government's and parliament's duties therein and obligations to treaties, adopted by "subordinate" UK statutes--the Northern Ireland Act 1998 to GFA, in particular.

Now rises an old atty joke concerning controversy and ahh "inevitable" perennial frustration of plaintiffs with The Law: Justice may prevail but has no power to enforce itself.

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.

Within the world of politics ...society.

English (673.3 KB - PDF)